Morals connects us to the world of values and forms a basis to relationships with others.
Being ethical is in its essence having a dialogue between good and bad, where these two try to understand themselves through each other.
Actions shouldn't be labelled as good or bad independent of the context where they appear. The border between good and bad shouldn't either be seen primarily between people, but inside oneself. Awareness of the good keeps up warmth and will to live, awareness of the evil or the weaknesses helps to keep you humble. In this way being human maintains its totality and dynamics. When we can see how good and bad are connected to each other, the good cannot change either to defenceless self-destruction or self-satisfied totalitarian behaviour and the evil cannot get realized in a blind and subconscious way.
At an emotional level, being ethical is about being able to enter into another person's experience, show empathy. It is also important for a person to be able to accept his or her own feelings and feelings of others. Feelings and emotions are never forbidden or wrong as intentions or actions can be.
"I Am Who I Am" This name that is given to God tells us what is most essential. If he IS, then even I have the right to be who I am . There is no need to hide even my weakest and darkest sides.
Accepting yourself as you are doesn't mean that everything you do is right. You have your own moral understanding of right and wrong and you just observe how much your behaviour differs from that understanding. Acceptance of yourself means that you have no need to make intellectual excuses, why what you did was actually the right thing to do, how the other one actually deserved it. Just calm observing of the difference between your understanding of right behaviour and your actual behaviour leads to improvement. Trying merely to control your behaviour, means non acceptance, and leads often to denial of your weaknesses and hiding them from yourself. In a similar way by just trying to control your eating gives often poor results. By being aware of your eating habits and how your diet makes you feel, without judgement, and also of what a healthy diet would be like, leads gradually, even if slowly, to real improvements. By merely controlling your eating you can get fast results in the beginning, but they don't usually last. Often the result of controlling is worsening of your condition.
You are not accepting yourself fully as you are, if your being good means polishing your self image and you are doing good things to get appreciation from others or even to feel superior to them. In these cases you are feeding the ego, the false-self, and that is not you. There is nothing to improve in your real self. You can only improve your understanding and your awareness and your skills.
When a person, as an object of idealization, is seen to be incomparably good, usually a moralistic way of seeing the world is there also. This is one of the big ethical paradoxes. Moralism usually cannot admit its own existence. Even if moralization can get expressed in many different forms, typical to it is projective dealing with problems. The own problems are seen outside, in something that is opposite to oneself.
Moralism can best be recognized by the methods it uses. The most common of them are fear mongering (intimidation), making people feel guilty, and abandonment
Real and lasting learning cannot be accomplished by moralistic means except when it creates rebellion and separation from the authorities.
Imagined or forced upon goodness is a prison to those who are under its spell. People become unable to learn new things and start to lose their individuality.
Using evil in disguise of good is a powerful tool to get oneself in a position of totalitarian power and a method which people with strong need to control others don't hesitate to use. This kind of evil can only be recognized by the methods that are used, because the ideas presented are often lofty, even noble and inspiring, with promises of a new era for humanity, if only you surrender whole heartedly to me or my ideas and start to proselytise the others also to those ideas. Actually the forcing and manipulative methods used are the evil, because the results created by these methods are devastating.
Usually a spiritual, or religious organization puts more emphasis on work done in the subjective inner domain than in political organizations, and that is what is good in them. Religious organizations also often get more powerful grip on people, because they tend to claim absolute authority in the name of God. In that way they are megalomaniac and less honest. The course of action an organization uses is essential, when evaluating it. In other words the path travelled is essential, not the lofty goal.
Seeing enemies or the problems to be outside belongs also to the tactics. Creating enemies and waging wars is an efficient method on a national level to turn the attention from domestic problems outside your country so you don't need to change any structures on the national level. Of course this is valid on individual level also. Instead of solving your problems, you act them out. Instead of facing your fears, you can feel strong and powerful by making others feel your fear instead. Actually that way you are spreading your own trauma, not solving it.
When the latest war in Iraq had just began, in a gathering I heard an old woman lamenting: Earlier she had seen good and evil fighting against each other in the wars.
But now in this war there was evil against evil. I think and I hope that there has happened a shift in the collective consciousness of humanity and most wars will be seen this way.
People with certain kind of personality structures are very much afraid of inner transformation and are easily tempted collectively to these kinds of solutions, when they feel insecure.
It is also important to understand that good and bad are relative concepts.
What is experienced as bad or evil in modern western society could have been beneficial in an ancient society. Even many of the cults with the above structures can be good in modern society , because they can help people to live those structures, and learn from the experiences. When the whole society is totalitarian, learning is much more difficult.
When you do something, very seldom the influence is only good, often some aspect of it is harmful also. Being ethical is kind of optimising the good and minimizing the bad.
Life couldn't have sustained, if a transformation at the border between good and bad where not possible.
Behind your own evil or weakness is the gate to the new . To this gate there is no other way than through embracing your weaknesses.